Compare homeopathic remedies
NEW CASE ANALYSIS
Start a new case analysis
Choose the symptoms recorded in the case. Then add details and compare the historical descriptions of homeopathic remedies.
- 1Read
- 2Confirm
- 3Start
To resume the case after a page reload or language change, a temporary copy is kept in storage for this browser tab. A copy that has not been updated for eight hours is rejected and removed the next time the tool reads it. Starting a new case also removes the copy.
About the tool, privacy and professional boundaries
The guest flow sends selected symptom identifiers and follow-up answers to the server for temporary computation. The tool does not save these case data on the server or send them to Stripe or analytics tools. This start confirmation is not saved.
Normal web server logs may record page and file requests, IP addresses and browser information.
I will enter only de-identified information — never names, personal identity numbers, contact details, exact dates of birth or medical record text, and no free text that could indirectly identify the person. Age in whole years and sex may be entered.
STEP 1 OF 3
Which symptoms are recorded in the case?
Several clear matches were found. Review each suggestion and select only the symptoms recorded in the case notes. Nothing is selected automatically.
STEP 2 OF 3
Follow-up questions
Answer from the notes and choose “Not sure” if the information is missing.
Homeopathic remedies in the source comparison
Source basis: The homeopathy tool’s preserved book references, Webhomeopathy’s separate repertories, and a shared registry of 38 source works. Method notes are used only for editorial clarity, follow-up questions and presentation.
Linked works and original text are shown for each symptom and remedy in the source trail below.
Databases, original works and source trail
The comparison uses the homeopathy tool’s preserved remedy relationships and Webhomeopathy’s separate repertories, headings, grades and ranking identities, together with a shared symptom and source registry.
The registry includes 38 source works, including Hering, Boericke, Kent, Lippe and four works by Boger/Bönninghausen. The source trail for an individual symptom and remedy shows only works in which the relationship has been substantiated.
Exact volume and page references are shown only when verified. Otherwise, the reference is explicitly identified at the level of the work or text.
Björn Lundberg’s method notes provide a secondary editorial layer for clarity, follow-up questions and presentation. They do not change source identity, remedy relationships, grades or ranking.
In a limited number of source-verified cases, modern pharmacological and toxicological information about the source substance provides a supplementary concordance signal. It does not change historical sources or grades and is not a claim of treatment effectiveness.
